BROADCAST investigative journalism once had a great tradition. Anyone of my generation, whatever their political perspective, will remember at least a couple of landmark documentaries that shook things up, such as Night and Fog; the Up series; Shoah; Death on the Rock; the belated Channel 5 exposé of the once ‘national treasure’ Jimmy Savile, National Disgrace, and Breaking the Silence: Truth and Lies in the War on Terror.
But where have the BBC or ITV or any of the main channels been when it has come to Truth and Lies in the War on Covid? Nowhere. Silence.
It needs professionalism, experience and skills to structure and present the evidence and arguments in a broadcast investigation. It is not for amateurs. While the digital revolution has multiplied platforms and opportunities for communication, this expansion has been matched by neither quality or impact. Effective documentary-making – interweaving professionally conducted interviews, actuality and complex information, visually illustrating and bringing all this together into a coherent narrative – is not easy. It’s the result of acquired and hard learnt skills by people with the aptitude and understanding. Because we can all speak does not mean we can all communicate.
It is a former ITV News executive, Mark Sharman, we have to thank for applying his skills to producing what all the paid broadcasters have shamefully failed to do – an extraordinarily powerful counter-blast documentary against the ‘safe and effective’ vaccine meme. It would be easy to rant, to dramatise and impose your prior view. Much harder to pursue the truth dispassionately and present it calmly.
This is what Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion does. It not only shines a light on the devastated lives of the vaccine-injured – all the more poignant for their trusting belief in the official insistence that it was their duty to have their jabs in the public good – but also on the British government’s systematic denial. From its investigation of the systemic failings that underlay this – the MHRA’s transformation from safety monitor to enabler (about which we reported in July) and the faulty Big Pharma trials so readily taken at face value by watchdogs despite being little more than a PR exercise – to showing the role of Sage and the mainstream media, including the Big Tech-controlled social media, in in corralling the public into compliance while suppressing and censoring ‘Covid disinformation’ debate, Sharman pulls together the personal and the political, with its circular and impenetrable bureaucracy and quangoland, into a compelling narrative. The film features several courageous doctors who will be familiar to TCW readers: heart specialist Dr Aseem Malhotra, about whom TCW‘s Sally Beck wrote on Friday, Dr Ros Jones of HART, who has tirelessly warned against child vaccination (many of her letters have been published by TCW) and Dr Clare Craig, who has featured in and written TCW articles.
Never was the communication of this second opinion more needed. The public’s safety did not and never came first. Far from being robust on safety, quality and effectiveness, these barely trialled and known to be risky (by the Pharma companies who produced them) vaccines were rolled out as a specious condition for ‘exiting’ Lockdown. Those who questioned the necessity, the logic, the science or the ethics were at best ignored or at worst and most often, cancelled, censored and demonised as irresponsible. That included eminent scientists, doctors, ordinary citizens and, most disgracefully, the vaccine injured.
You can watch it here (on YouTube)
Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion (2022) | Oracle Films | News Uncut
And you can share the link here with as many relatives, friends, colleagues, MPs, as you can think of.
Shared widely enough, this film has the power to do what investigative documentaries used to do – shake things up. All concerned members of the public are in Mark Sharman’s debt for using his professional know-how and his moral courage and commitment in the pursuit of the truth.
Hi Zana Carver, Ph.D. - it may be important to watch this introduction. Last night, found the Highwire program aired last Thursday with the interview/introduction to this documentary with Mark Sharman (WHO KNEW? Initially watched only the documentary alone, without the history). Mark had several stunning statements, including that this documentary was basically drafted and assembled on a kitchen table. And when Del Bigtree asked about what Mark's contacts in British media thought about the documentary, Mark's reply was "they did not believe me"!!! Talk about effective brainwashing. Truly scary how these injured people were forced to navigate an unsupportive and insulting health system to eventually find needed help.
Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion shines a light on Covid-19 vaccine injuries and bereavements, but also to takes an encompassing look at the systemic failings that appear to have enabled them. We look at leading analysis of pharmaceutical trials, the role of the MHRA in regulating these products, the role of the SAGE behavioural scientists in influencing policy and the role of the media and Big Tech companies in supressing free and open debate on the subject.
Produced in collaboration with Oracle Films and Mark Sharman; Former ITV and BSkyB Executive and News Uncut, it's a self-financed, one-hour TV programme, formatted for 2 commercial breaks.
The film is available to watch here in 4K.
English subtitles are available. More languages are being created currently.
‘Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion’ – here is a professionally produced, balanced, up-to-date film assessing the impact of genetically engineered Covid-19 vaccines. A film that everyone should watch. A film that you can send to your friends and relatives. It contains interviews with leading scientists and doctors. It also offers ample opportunity for UK corporate media and government advisory and health officials to respond to questions and criticisms.
The film includes in-depth interviews with a few of those injured by Covid vaccination. It primarily focuses on the situation in the UK, but by inference covers the pandemic response around the world.
By Dr. Guy Hatchard
It is of particular note that the pandemic response here in New Zealand was far more heavy-handed than the very concerning features of the pandemic response in the UK reported in the film.
Our lockdowns were longer and more restrictive.
The control and funding of our media content were more coercive.
Our government Covid advertising budget was higher per capita.
Our advertising messages were even more outrageous, containing false claims of absolute safety and effectiveness.
Our vaccine mandates and passes were more restrictive.
Our government accident compensation programme routinely denied claims for vaccine injury.
Vaccine exemptions were almost never granted even in the case of prior vaccine injury.
Unlike the UK, our government is still supporting universal child vaccination against the conclusions of scientific journal publishing.
Our leaders played a more significant role in the global promotion of Covid vaccination and restriction of public information.
Our government concluded an agreement with social media platforms to restrict any messaging that is contrary to government pandemic policy.
Unlike the UK, our government paid cash grants to media which were used to fund the persecution of Covid vaccine hesitant groups and individuals.
Our courts and regulatory agencies sided with the government without sufficient investigation, apparently bypassing key provisions of the New Zealand Bill of Rights.
Our government curtailed our right to protest and ask questions.
Vaccine mandates were applied in multiple professions and thereby our hard-won employment rights were restricted and permanently cancelled.
Our government withheld vital public health data. As a result, hiding: the true extent of vaccine injury, the reasons for our record rates of excess all-cause mortality, low rates of Covid mortality, and ultimately exaggerating vaccine effectiveness and safety.
Our government labelled unrestricted online access a threat to democracy, a source of violent extremism, and a cause of war.
Against the conclusions of internationally published analysis in scientific journals, our government maintains that only one death in the entire country during the last 19 months can be attributed to the effect of Covid-19 vaccination.
Bear these points in mind as you watch this film. We are living through a period where truth and honesty concerning medical risk are hard to come by. This film lays it out for you simply and honestly. It asks important questions.
Oracle Films: Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion, 28 September 2022 (55 mins)
New Zealand’s Guy Hatchard, PhD, is an international advocate of food safety and natural medicine. He was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID, a global food safety testing and certification laboratory. He has lectured and advised governments in countries around the world on health and education initiatives. You can find more articles by Hatchard on his website The Hatchard Report HERE. https://hatchardreport.com/
DRACO Down the Memory Hole They had a cure over a decade ago, but not for you
From Anna Von Reitz
Please Publish ALL of This On the Websites!
by Spartacus
On July 27th, 2011, a paper was published in PLOS ONE describing a novel protein biologic antiviral. It was called DRACO, an acronym for Double-stranded RNA Activated Caspase Oligomerizer.
Unsafe and ineffective – Mark Sharman’s powerful new documentary on the vaccine
By Kathy Gyngell -October 2, 2022
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/unsafe-and-ineffective-mark-sharmans-powerful-new-documentary/
BROADCAST investigative journalism once had a great tradition. Anyone of my generation, whatever their political perspective, will remember at least a couple of landmark documentaries that shook things up, such as Night and Fog; the Up series; Shoah; Death on the Rock; the belated Channel 5 exposé of the once ‘national treasure’ Jimmy Savile, National Disgrace, and Breaking the Silence: Truth and Lies in the War on Terror.
But where have the BBC or ITV or any of the main channels been when it has come to Truth and Lies in the War on Covid? Nowhere. Silence.
It needs professionalism, experience and skills to structure and present the evidence and arguments in a broadcast investigation. It is not for amateurs. While the digital revolution has multiplied platforms and opportunities for communication, this expansion has been matched by neither quality or impact. Effective documentary-making – interweaving professionally conducted interviews, actuality and complex information, visually illustrating and bringing all this together into a coherent narrative – is not easy. It’s the result of acquired and hard learnt skills by people with the aptitude and understanding. Because we can all speak does not mean we can all communicate.
It is a former ITV News executive, Mark Sharman, we have to thank for applying his skills to producing what all the paid broadcasters have shamefully failed to do – an extraordinarily powerful counter-blast documentary against the ‘safe and effective’ vaccine meme. It would be easy to rant, to dramatise and impose your prior view. Much harder to pursue the truth dispassionately and present it calmly.
This is what Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion does. It not only shines a light on the devastated lives of the vaccine-injured – all the more poignant for their trusting belief in the official insistence that it was their duty to have their jabs in the public good – but also on the British government’s systematic denial. From its investigation of the systemic failings that underlay this – the MHRA’s transformation from safety monitor to enabler (about which we reported in July) and the faulty Big Pharma trials so readily taken at face value by watchdogs despite being little more than a PR exercise – to showing the role of Sage and the mainstream media, including the Big Tech-controlled social media, in in corralling the public into compliance while suppressing and censoring ‘Covid disinformation’ debate, Sharman pulls together the personal and the political, with its circular and impenetrable bureaucracy and quangoland, into a compelling narrative. The film features several courageous doctors who will be familiar to TCW readers: heart specialist Dr Aseem Malhotra, about whom TCW‘s Sally Beck wrote on Friday, Dr Ros Jones of HART, who has tirelessly warned against child vaccination (many of her letters have been published by TCW) and Dr Clare Craig, who has featured in and written TCW articles.
Never was the communication of this second opinion more needed. The public’s safety did not and never came first. Far from being robust on safety, quality and effectiveness, these barely trialled and known to be risky (by the Pharma companies who produced them) vaccines were rolled out as a specious condition for ‘exiting’ Lockdown. Those who questioned the necessity, the logic, the science or the ethics were at best ignored or at worst and most often, cancelled, censored and demonised as irresponsible. That included eminent scientists, doctors, ordinary citizens and, most disgracefully, the vaccine injured.
You can watch it here (on YouTube)
Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion (2022) | Oracle Films | News Uncut
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIVZ5ssWB-o&feature=emb_title&ab_channel=OracleFilms
And you can share the link here with as many relatives, friends, colleagues, MPs, as you can think of.
Shared widely enough, this film has the power to do what investigative documentaries used to do – shake things up. All concerned members of the public are in Mark Sharman’s debt for using his professional know-how and his moral courage and commitment in the pursuit of the truth.
At work, they are allowing (soon to be, encouraging, then mandating.,, all in classicsocialmarxist fashion,).. use of garbage pronouns.
Mine: I am transitioning to Silverback.
Please call me as such.
Or, Ty Cobb. Have not decided my insane reality i want to impose on commie bastards.
Oh, and then they'll fire me, or have me arrested as enemy of the state
Let the poor animals breed normally. Feel bad for that cow.
On welfare, specifically the cash payout ( leaving aside Food stamps, Medicaid).
It was designed to separate the father from the family. Early 60s. Freemasons, commies want to destroy family. Destroy family, you're almost there.
It looks like idiotic, futile program... until you realize what they're doing.
They are gnawing away at everything. This is final 10 yards... if they take America, they have their one world order: hell on earth
Hi Zana Carver, Ph.D. - it may be important to watch this introduction. Last night, found the Highwire program aired last Thursday with the interview/introduction to this documentary with Mark Sharman (WHO KNEW? Initially watched only the documentary alone, without the history). Mark had several stunning statements, including that this documentary was basically drafted and assembled on a kitchen table. And when Del Bigtree asked about what Mark's contacts in British media thought about the documentary, Mark's reply was "they did not believe me"!!! Talk about effective brainwashing. Truly scary how these injured people were forced to navigate an unsupportive and insulting health system to eventually find needed help.
Here's the full link:
A SECOND OPINION (EPISODE 287) THE HIGHWIRE - https://www.bitchute.com/video/wvv8AZ9vbdNm/
On the Highwire site
https://thehighwire.com/videos/safe-and-effective-a-second-opinion/
The 3 minute trailer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYQ85MxR7kk
A very short review
https://voiceofeast.net/2022/09/29/safe-and-effective-a-second-opinion/
The Highwire episode dedicated to the movie
https://thehighwire.com/videos/episode-287-a-second-opinion/
If the video is removed from YouTube, you can watch it HERE. https://www.oraclefilms.com/safeandeffective
Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion
Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion shines a light on Covid-19 vaccine injuries and bereavements, but also to takes an encompassing look at the systemic failings that appear to have enabled them. We look at leading analysis of pharmaceutical trials, the role of the MHRA in regulating these products, the role of the SAGE behavioural scientists in influencing policy and the role of the media and Big Tech companies in supressing free and open debate on the subject.
Produced in collaboration with Oracle Films and Mark Sharman; Former ITV and BSkyB Executive and News Uncut, it's a self-financed, one-hour TV programme, formatted for 2 commercial breaks.
The film is available to watch here in 4K.
English subtitles are available. More languages are being created currently.
Are Vaccines Safe and Effective? Watch This Film to Find Out
BY RHODA WILSON ON OCTOBER 3, 2022
https://expose-news.com/2022/10/03/are-vaccines-safe-and-effective-watch/
‘Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion’ – here is a professionally produced, balanced, up-to-date film assessing the impact of genetically engineered Covid-19 vaccines. A film that everyone should watch. A film that you can send to your friends and relatives. It contains interviews with leading scientists and doctors. It also offers ample opportunity for UK corporate media and government advisory and health officials to respond to questions and criticisms.
The film includes in-depth interviews with a few of those injured by Covid vaccination. It primarily focuses on the situation in the UK, but by inference covers the pandemic response around the world.
By Dr. Guy Hatchard
It is of particular note that the pandemic response here in New Zealand was far more heavy-handed than the very concerning features of the pandemic response in the UK reported in the film.
Our lockdowns were longer and more restrictive.
The control and funding of our media content were more coercive.
Our government Covid advertising budget was higher per capita.
Our advertising messages were even more outrageous, containing false claims of absolute safety and effectiveness.
Our vaccine mandates and passes were more restrictive.
Our government accident compensation programme routinely denied claims for vaccine injury.
Vaccine exemptions were almost never granted even in the case of prior vaccine injury.
Unlike the UK, our government is still supporting universal child vaccination against the conclusions of scientific journal publishing.
Our leaders played a more significant role in the global promotion of Covid vaccination and restriction of public information.
Our government concluded an agreement with social media platforms to restrict any messaging that is contrary to government pandemic policy.
Unlike the UK, our government paid cash grants to media which were used to fund the persecution of Covid vaccine hesitant groups and individuals.
Our courts and regulatory agencies sided with the government without sufficient investigation, apparently bypassing key provisions of the New Zealand Bill of Rights.
Our government curtailed our right to protest and ask questions.
Vaccine mandates were applied in multiple professions and thereby our hard-won employment rights were restricted and permanently cancelled.
Our government withheld vital public health data. As a result, hiding: the true extent of vaccine injury, the reasons for our record rates of excess all-cause mortality, low rates of Covid mortality, and ultimately exaggerating vaccine effectiveness and safety.
Our government labelled unrestricted online access a threat to democracy, a source of violent extremism, and a cause of war.
Against the conclusions of internationally published analysis in scientific journals, our government maintains that only one death in the entire country during the last 19 months can be attributed to the effect of Covid-19 vaccination.
Bear these points in mind as you watch this film. We are living through a period where truth and honesty concerning medical risk are hard to come by. This film lays it out for you simply and honestly. It asks important questions.
Oracle Films: Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion, 28 September 2022 (55 mins)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIVZ5ssWB-o&ab_channel=OracleFilms
If the video above is removed from YouTube, you can watch it HERE. https://www.oraclefilms.com/safeandeffective
About the Author
New Zealand’s Guy Hatchard, PhD, is an international advocate of food safety and natural medicine. He was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID, a global food safety testing and certification laboratory. He has lectured and advised governments in countries around the world on health and education initiatives. You can find more articles by Hatchard on his website The Hatchard Report HERE. https://hatchardreport.com/
"DRACO Down the Memory Hole They had a cure over a decade ago, but not for you"
Regarding copyright, see Legal Notice on the linked page:
http://www.paulstramer.net/2022/09/draco-down-memory-hole-they-had-cure.html
Tuesday, September 20, 2022
DRACO Down the Memory Hole They had a cure over a decade ago, but not for you
From Anna Von Reitz
Please Publish ALL of This On the Websites!
by Spartacus
On July 27th, 2011, a paper was published in PLOS ONE describing a novel protein biologic antiviral. It was called DRACO, an acronym for Double-stranded RNA Activated Caspase Oligomerizer.
Read the article on Substack here:
https://2ndsmartestguyintheworld.substack.com/p/draco-down-the-memory-hole?s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&utm_source=direct
God Bless You Thanks
kindest respectful regards John Scottish Veteran