Lesson from Animals
Recently we went through the process of having a cow bred, inseminated actually. What a process! First Petunia was given a slow release of progesterone from an implanted device for one week. She was then given a shot of luteinizing hormone (LH), which triggers ovulation. Then 3 days later she was given the semen and a shot of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH.) This all sounds fine, right? I had no idea how much the hormones would affect her.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/07/8e/c5/078ec522af4ba72148bdad3e8515f8c3.jpg
The day after she was given the LH injection, she started mooing loudly. In fact, I could hear it from about 4:00 in the morning on. She would not stop mooing and it was constant for at least 24 hours. When I went to check on her, she was agitated. Petunia was irritable with Daisy and Lily, Lily being her calf. She would push them around the pasture and not let Lily nurse. She was pacing back and forth along the fence that we share with a neighbor who has steers. Our neighbor had moved the steers over to the next pasture meaning there was an empty pasture between them. Her moos became so loud and intense that she would wheeze at the end of them, and I worried that she might have some weird respiratory infection. She never stopping mooing that day. I gave her hey and she wasn’t interested at all, which is highly unusual for her. Then I got it, she’s ovulating and wants a bull really bad, and she could not think of anything else, and probably didn’t even sleep the night before.
I was worried that a neighboring bull might jump the fence and find her if she didn’t calm down soon. This would have been a disaster since she’s a full blood Wagyu and we specifically chose semen from a select group of Wagyu bulls. But I felt so bad for her and wondered if it was unfair to do the insemination. Then I learned that not only can breeding damage a bull (broken penises happen) but also can damage a heifer (if the bull is too heavy, their back can break during copulation.) The next day she was especially calm and quiet. I do not know if she just wore herself out or if she tore her vocal cords mooing. The point here is that biology is complex but always exactly what’s needed to propagate the species. Let’s explore this from another angle.
Fertility Excess
Growing up in Montana we played basketball with teams on a Native American reservation. The one in our class was Rocky Boy. It is their way for young teens in their tribe to start having babies as early as possible and as many as possible. Sadly, the reason is that each baby increased the amount of money the government paid their family. In fact, they viewed any girl that hasn’t been pregnant by the age of 16 as odd or having something wrong with her. Playing basketball with them was always an experience, since at any given time about 1/3 of their team was visibly showing signs of pregnancy. The girl I was supposed to guard looked about 6 months pregnant and I was terrified of accidently bumping into her. I gave her a good 5 feet of distance between us the whole time and she could have easily plowed me over and I would have let her.
https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/DC82EE48-BC85-43AA-B64B4F3129F0017C_source.jpg?w=590&h=800&75C123B0-45E4-4AA4-8B4F077BDE6AB1FE
If we extend this to our current welfare system, we now have 2nd and 3rd generation offspring on the system. This policy of hand outs increases the payout for each new baby. No one wants women, babies, and children to go hungry and for arguments sake, it’s possible that some pregnancies were not intentional. With that in mind, we should do everything possible to help infants and mothers. If that includes food and resources, adoption services, and free healthcare then yes but only for a temporary period of time. Welfare was meant to help widows and unwed mothers and meant to be temporary. Anyone can go through a difficult time and need some occasional help, but it has to be temporary. My thoughts are it should only be for 2 years and/or only for 2 pregnancies. If it were limited, you would not have all of the welfare abuses and manipulation that are currently bleeding taxpayers dry.
Fertility Deficiency
There is a whole soup of endocrine disrupting chemicals in our environment. In fact, not only has fertility been declining but sperm counts are lower, testosterone levels in males are lower, there are higher rates of polycystic ovarian syndrome, and most antidepressants negatively affect sex drive. If this weren’t enough progressives have weaponized morality to guilt trip those who are heterosexual and want a family.
Finally, the COVID-19 experimental products negatively affect fertility and we currently do no know the full scope of the effects. If I had to guess the effects of the mRNA that can incorporate into the genome with endogenous reverse transcriptase and based on Dr. Skinner’s epigenetic research, I would hypothesize the female adverse reproductive effects to be transgenerational. The adverse reproductive effects in males are already clear and not as transient as the authors of a recent publication would have you believe. The injections clearly lower sperm count in a dose dependent manor.
Reproductive Tyranny
This is where I need to point out that China’s surveillance system tracks everything. This includes when women buy menstrual products, pregnancy tests, and prior pregnancy and childbirth history. This is how they know when a woman is pregnant and if it’s okay for her to be pregnant based on family size and gender of her children. Does this sound conspiratorial? My phone knew I needed razors before I did; tell me you don’t already get targeted adds. Are we really arrogant enough to think that our government wouldn’t someday like to control our family size?
Let’s explore this for a minute. It’s not that far off with all of the climate change and carbon footprint agenda they are pushing. Why wouldn’t they someday determine that parents can’t have more than 2 children? Maybe only some people that they consider genetically superior will be allowed to reproduce and that’s if reproduction is still possible for most of the population. Don’t think that plans to control fertility is a third world problem because it’s not.
Closing Thoughts
Which brings me to the big picture. All of this propaganda is an attack on the nuclear family. From their cries of “toxic masculinity” to trying to redefine what a woman is, or even worse decide a woman is whatever subjective means a person choses to use in their own definition. It’s clear with the recent decision of the FDA to approve the COVID- 19 products for babies six months old to five years that something is terribly wrong. Not only is COVID-19 not an emergency for young children but the injections carry significant known and unknown risks. Their motive has always been twofold, to propagandize children by destroying parental rights and slandering the traditional roles of parents. Second, to reduce the population in order to maintain tighter control on the remaining population.
https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1511895426328-dc8714191300?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&w=1000&q=80
Robert Adams once said, “there is only one decision you need to make: You are either working at your Freedom or you are accepting your bondage.” So, I ask you, which is it? Do you politely comply with every ridiculous mandate and policy the government gaslights us with thinking we will get back to normal? No, you cannot comply your way out of tyranny and those who desire control will NEVER be satisfied. If you give them an inch, they will take a mile. If you can, quit taking hand outs and prepare to live off grid. The strings they attach to the stimulus checks, grants, or other funds are simply not worth selling your soul over. The beast system is coming soon, please be ready. In the meantime, do not comply. This is how it all started in Nazi Germany before the holocaust. Oh, and read up on eugenics, which also came from Nazi Germany. Ultimately, when a woman wants a baby, no one is going to get between her and her bull!
References
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XVKvAVaNDssFMZvKwwLPgiI-yiAhgnrs/view (35 minutes in)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35713410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8446925/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/iNOnpkJH1a8J/
https://informedchoicewa.org/news/final-betrayal-fda-cdc-vote-to-inject-babies/
Unsafe and ineffective – Mark Sharman’s powerful new documentary on the vaccine
By Kathy Gyngell -October 2, 2022
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/unsafe-and-ineffective-mark-sharmans-powerful-new-documentary/
BROADCAST investigative journalism once had a great tradition. Anyone of my generation, whatever their political perspective, will remember at least a couple of landmark documentaries that shook things up, such as Night and Fog; the Up series; Shoah; Death on the Rock; the belated Channel 5 exposé of the once ‘national treasure’ Jimmy Savile, National Disgrace, and Breaking the Silence: Truth and Lies in the War on Terror.
But where have the BBC or ITV or any of the main channels been when it has come to Truth and Lies in the War on Covid? Nowhere. Silence.
It needs professionalism, experience and skills to structure and present the evidence and arguments in a broadcast investigation. It is not for amateurs. While the digital revolution has multiplied platforms and opportunities for communication, this expansion has been matched by neither quality or impact. Effective documentary-making – interweaving professionally conducted interviews, actuality and complex information, visually illustrating and bringing all this together into a coherent narrative – is not easy. It’s the result of acquired and hard learnt skills by people with the aptitude and understanding. Because we can all speak does not mean we can all communicate.
It is a former ITV News executive, Mark Sharman, we have to thank for applying his skills to producing what all the paid broadcasters have shamefully failed to do – an extraordinarily powerful counter-blast documentary against the ‘safe and effective’ vaccine meme. It would be easy to rant, to dramatise and impose your prior view. Much harder to pursue the truth dispassionately and present it calmly.
This is what Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion does. It not only shines a light on the devastated lives of the vaccine-injured – all the more poignant for their trusting belief in the official insistence that it was their duty to have their jabs in the public good – but also on the British government’s systematic denial. From its investigation of the systemic failings that underlay this – the MHRA’s transformation from safety monitor to enabler (about which we reported in July) and the faulty Big Pharma trials so readily taken at face value by watchdogs despite being little more than a PR exercise – to showing the role of Sage and the mainstream media, including the Big Tech-controlled social media, in in corralling the public into compliance while suppressing and censoring ‘Covid disinformation’ debate, Sharman pulls together the personal and the political, with its circular and impenetrable bureaucracy and quangoland, into a compelling narrative. The film features several courageous doctors who will be familiar to TCW readers: heart specialist Dr Aseem Malhotra, about whom TCW‘s Sally Beck wrote on Friday, Dr Ros Jones of HART, who has tirelessly warned against child vaccination (many of her letters have been published by TCW) and Dr Clare Craig, who has featured in and written TCW articles.
Never was the communication of this second opinion more needed. The public’s safety did not and never came first. Far from being robust on safety, quality and effectiveness, these barely trialled and known to be risky (by the Pharma companies who produced them) vaccines were rolled out as a specious condition for ‘exiting’ Lockdown. Those who questioned the necessity, the logic, the science or the ethics were at best ignored or at worst and most often, cancelled, censored and demonised as irresponsible. That included eminent scientists, doctors, ordinary citizens and, most disgracefully, the vaccine injured.
You can watch it here (on YouTube)
Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion (2022) | Oracle Films | News Uncut
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIVZ5ssWB-o&feature=emb_title&ab_channel=OracleFilms
And you can share the link here with as many relatives, friends, colleagues, MPs, as you can think of.
Shared widely enough, this film has the power to do what investigative documentaries used to do – shake things up. All concerned members of the public are in Mark Sharman’s debt for using his professional know-how and his moral courage and commitment in the pursuit of the truth.
At work, they are allowing (soon to be, encouraging, then mandating.,, all in classicsocialmarxist fashion,).. use of garbage pronouns.
Mine: I am transitioning to Silverback.
Please call me as such.
Or, Ty Cobb. Have not decided my insane reality i want to impose on commie bastards.
Oh, and then they'll fire me, or have me arrested as enemy of the state